It's fair to say that while you've ridden as a passenger in your organization's fire trucks or ambulances, you've formulated an observed opinion of each driver. So, how would you (honestly) rate each one of your emergency service organization's (ESO) drivers using 1 to 5 stars?
It might be the first time you're thinking about this, but while these ratings are available online across virtually every industry—our drivers are rarely evaluated, even during an annual employee appraisal process.
We truly understand the importance of scene-safety—but it's equally important to have a safe, smooth and responsible driving response along the way. After all, the lives of firefighters, medics and citizens remain at risk all the same. That's why we recommend developing a solid, documented and comprehensive driver qualification program.
The purpose of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and Standard Operating Guidelines (SOGs) is to clearly identify expected behaviors and anticipated actions. Driving SOPs and SOGs should cover the qualification components for all drivers (described below), as well as the specific driving expectations and operations, including topics like speed, intersection safety, rollover awareness and mitigation and backing safety.
Have documented basic standards that qualify an individual to learn how to drive an emergency vehicle, including traits like:
If your state has specific regulatory standards for emergency service drivers, you should follow those at a minimum. We also recommend utilizing a state or nationally-recognized driver training program that includes classroom didactics (as well as a written examination), a controlled driving course (usually referred to as the cone course) and over-the road, and documented assessments in non-emergency and emergency mode.
Driving evaluations can be done in a variety of ways and there's new performance technology quickly evolving. Here are a few mechanisms available today that your ESO can use to give your drivers feedback:
NFPA 1451, the Standard for a Fire and Emergency Service Vehicle Operations Training Program, recommends that driver refresher training be conducted twice each year, and most insurance companies recommend at least an annual refresher training.
Interestingly enough, most entities don't specify the type or length of refresher training. So the key is that regardless of what format your refresher training is (cone course, over the road course evaluation, classroom reviews, case studies, etc.), you need to clearly document the training type and length.
During a recent Emergency Vehicle Driver Training (EVDT) Program class discussion, I asked a group of responders, 'what normally happens when a driver in your ESO is involved in a minor incident/scratch-type of collision?' Their answer collectively was, “we're told to be more careful and don’t let it happen again."
This may sound intuitive enough, but as they say in our business, “all large fires start small”. This can be a recipe for disaster because the next time a similar incident occurs, the driver will expect the same, non-punitive action. All vehicle collision/damage incidents should be investigated by an objective incident review team that ultimately identifies recommendations and potential remedial training, when appropriate.
Putting in the work to improve your driving safety through a well-established comprehensive qualification program and continuing to update that program as needed is vital for the long-term success and safety of your organization and team. And it's not just about improving the competency of some drivers, it's also about formally recognizing drivers who deserve that 5-star rating and who work to achieve “Everyone Goes Home” on a daily basis. After all, we're in this together.